List of Figures | p. xiii |
List of Tables | p. xv |
About the Authors | p. xvii |
Executive Summary | p. 1 |
Recommendations for Assessing the Risks of Herbicides and Plant Growth Regulators to Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 2 |
Introduction and Background | p. 5 |
Guidance, Recommendations, and Proposed Decision Scheme for Additional Aquatic Macrophyte Tests | p. 9 |
Rationale | p. 9 |
Tier 1: Proposed Decision Scheme for Additional Aquatic Macrophyte Tests | p. 10 |
Alternative Species Test at Tier 1 | p. 12 |
Ecotoxicolbgical Endpoints for a Tier 1 Test | p. 12 |
Higher-Tier Risk Assessment | p. 13 |
Exposure Considerations | p. 13 |
Selection of Relevant Species | p. 14 |
Species Sensitivity Distributions | p. 14 |
Species Selection | p. 14 |
Endpoint Selection | p. 15 |
Multispecies Tests Including Microcosms and Mesocosms | p. 16 |
Ecological Context | p. 17 |
Informing Decision-Making | p. 18 |
Regulatory Issues Concerning Effects of Pesticides on Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 19 |
Why Macrophytes are Important in Regulatory Aquatic Risk Assessment | p. 19 |
Key Regulatory Issues | p. 20 |
Tier 1 Assessments | p. 20 |
Higher-Tier Assessments | p. 21 |
Communication and Knowledge Transfer | p. 24 |
Knowledge Gaps | p. 24 |
Methodologies: Strengths and Weaknesses | p. 25 |
What Single-Species Laboratory Tests Are Currently Available or Are Being Developed? | p. 26 |
Available Test Protocols | p. 26 |
What Are the Main Differences between Lemna and Other Macrophytes in Terms of Life-History Traits, Recovery, Experimental Variability, and Sensitivity? | p. 27 |
What Criteria Should Be Considered When New Test Methods Are Developed? | p. 28 |
Which Species and Endpoints Should Be Used in SSDs? | p. 29 |
What Is the Representativeness and Sensitivity of Macrophyte Species Used in Microcosm, Mesocosm, and Semi-Field Studies? | p. 30 |
Characterizing and Assessing Risk Using Case Studies | p. 33 |
Introduction | p. 33 |
Case Study Evaluations | p. 34 |
AMRAP-Auxin | p. 34 |
Introduction | p. 34 |
Higher-Tier Data | p. 34 |
AMRAP-Phenylurea | p. 38 |
Introduction | p. 38 |
Higher-Tier Data | p. 38 |
AMRAP-SU | p. 41 |
Introduction | p. 41 |
Higher-Tier Data | p. 41 |
Reports of Workgroups and Follow-up Investigations | p. 45 |
Workgroup 1: Criteria for Assessing the Need for an Additional Macrophyte Test | p. 46 |
Introduction | p. 46 |
Decision-Making Criteria for Additional Macrophyte Tests at Tier 1 | p. 46 |
Workgroup 2: Development of a Proposed Test at Method for the Rooted Aquatic Macrophyte, Myriophyllum sp | p. 47 |
Introduction | p. 47 |
Principle of the Test | p. 48 |
Relevant Information on the Test Substance | p. 48 |
Validity of the Test | p. 48 |
Description of the Test Method | p. 49 |
Test Vessels | p. 49 |
Selection of Species | p. 49 |
Sediment | p. 49 |
Water Medium | p. 50 |
Test Procedure | p. 50 |
Test Conditions | p. 51 |
Analytical Measurements of Test Substance | p. 52 |
Data Evaluation | p. 52 |
Reporting | p. 53 |
Appendix to Chapter 5: Nutrient Media | p. 54 |
Workgroup 3: Use of Additional Macrophyte Test Species: Current Experience | p. 56 |
Workgroup 4: Investigating the SSD Approach as a Higher-Tier Tool for Risk Assessment of Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 59 |
Background and Objectives | p. 59 |
Creation of a Database on Aquatic Macrophyte Toxicity | p. 60 |
Progress to Date and Way Forward | p. 62 |
Keynote Presentations | p. 65 |
Aquatic Macrophytes in Agricultural Landscapes | p. 65 |
Introduction | p. 65 |
Functional Role of Macrophytes | p. 65 |
Wetland Plants as a Component of Biodiversity | p. 65 |
Macrophytes as Habitat for Other Organisms | p. 66 |
Macrophytes as Food and Oviposition Sites | p. 67 |
Role of Macrophytes in Supporting Ecosystem Functions | p. 69 |
Patterns of Macrophyte Biodiversity in the Agricultural Landscape | p. 70 |
Conclusions | p. 73 |
Regulatory Issues with Respect to the Risk Assessment of Macrophytes | p. 75 |
Introduction | p. 75 |
First Tier | p. 76 |
Higher Tier | p. 77 |
Recovery Issues | p. 78 |
Field and Semi-Field Tests | p. 79 |
Ecological Modeling | p. 79 |
Linking Fate and Effects | p. 80 |
Critical Evaluation of Laboratory Toxicity Testing Methods with Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 80 |
Introduction | p. 80 |
Lemna sp. as a Test Species | p. 81 |
Rooted Macrophyte Tests and Test Requirements | p. 81 |
Assessment Parameters and Endpoints | p. 82 |
Is Lemna Representative? An Overview of SSDs | p. 82 |
Which Endpoint Is More Sensitive? Dependence on Pesticide Mode of Action | p. 85 |
Conclusion | p. 85 |
Critical Evaluation of (Semi-) Field Methods Using Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 86 |
Why Macrophytes and Microcosm and Mesocosm Toxicity Testing? | p. 86 |
What Mesocosm Macrophyte Toxicity Testing Methods Are Currently In Vogue? | p. 87 |
What Testing Approaches Do We Recommend with Macrophytes and Mesocosms? | p. 88 |
What Else Should We Consider in Our Mesocosm Macrophyte Studies? | p. 89 |
What Do We Conclude About Mesocosm Testing and Macrophytes? | p. 91 |
Stakeholder Opinion on Current Approaches to the Assessment of the Risk of Plant Protection Products to Aquatic Macrophytes | p. 91 |
Introduction | p. 91 |
European Stakeholder Responses | p. 92 |
Response from the US Environmental Protection Agency: Risk Assessment for Aquatic Plants | p. 99 |
Conclusions | p. 99 |
References | p. 101 |
AMRAP Case Studies | p. 107 |
Case Study A: AMRAP-Auxin | p. 107 |
General Properties | p. 107 |
Predicted Environmental Concentrations | p. 108 |
Tier 1 Toxicity Data for Algae and Aquatid Plants | p. 108 |
Toxicity Exposure Ratios | p. 108 |
Higher-Tier Data: Laboratory Studies with Additional Species (Studies 2 and 3) | p. 108 |
Study 4: Outdoor Microcosm Study | p. 112 |
Case Study B: AMRAP-Phenylurea | p. 112 |
General Properties | p. 112 |
Predicted Environmental Concentrations | p. 113 |
Tier 1 Toxicity Data for Algae and Aquatic Plants | p. 113 |
Preliminary Toxicity Exposure Ratios | p. 114 |
Higher-tier Data | p. 114 |
Study 1; Laboratory Study with Myriophyllum Spicatum and Potamogeton Perfoliatus | p. 114 |
Study 2: Indoor Mesocosm and Elodea Nuttallii Bioassay | p. 114 |
Study 3: Outdoor Mesocosm Study | p. 115 |
Case Study C: AMRAP-SU | p. 117 |
General Information | p. 117 |
Predicted Environmental Concentrations | p. 118 |
Tier 1 Toxicity Data for Algae and Aquatic Plants | p. 119 |
Toxicity Exposure Ratios | p. 119 |
Higher-Tier Studies | p. 119 |
Study 1: Lemna Recovery Studies | p. 119 |
Study 2: Laboratory Study with Additional Species | p. 120 |
List of Workshop Participants, Workgroup Members | p. 123 |
List of AMRAP Workshop Sponsors | p. 125 |
Glossary of Terms | p. 127 |
Index | p. 133 |
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |