Failures of American Civil Justice in International Perspective

"It's a fantastic work that lays out in clear, calm language a nonspecialist can appreciate how the experience of going to court in the United States differs from that in other advanced countries -- specifically, Germany and South Korea. Ironically, foreign legal systems often achieve better results precisely by following practices that American courts once followed in earlier eras, such as narrowing the range of issues at an early stage and requiring that compulsory evidence-gathering processes be closely supervised by a judge. Waves of supposedly liberalizing reforms in this country -- such as the adoption of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.) in the 1930s, and the expansion of unsupervised discovery in the 1970s and 1980s -- stripped away protections against undue expense and strategic use of the process." - Walter Olson, Cato Institute
"This ambitious book critiques the American civil justice system through a comparative analysis of the United States, German, and South Korean legal systems....The book's strength is in showing how procedures and methods found in the German and Korean systems can be used to overcome shortcomings found in the American system. At first blush, I thought that given the enormity of the task, the book would prove unable to fulfill its stated goals. However, to my suyrprise and satisfaction the book accomplishes much of what it sought out to accomplish....The book is a worthy contribution to the current literature on comparative civil justice....The book should be required reading in law schools." - Larry A. DiMatteo, Bibliothek
"Failures of American Civil Justice in International Perspective is a fundamental and innovative work, which the comparative law discussion enduringly enriches and from whose teachings every reader will receive a great profit." - Felix Maultzsch, Juristenzeitung