Preface | |
Introduction Laurence Boisson de Chazournes and Philippe Sands | |
Actors, Institutions and the International Court of Justice | |
Who are the addressees of the Opinions? | |
Quels sont les destinataires des avis? | |
On discretion: reflections on the nature of the consultative function of the International Court of Jusitce Georges Abi-Saab | |
ET and the International Court of Justice: reflections of an extraterrestrial on the two Advisory Opinions | |
E.T. a la Cour Internationale de Justice: meditations d'un extra-terrestre sur deux avis consultatifs | |
The jurisdiction and merits phases distinguished | |
Reflections on the principle of speciality revisited and the 'politicisation' of the specialised agencies | |
Quelques reflexions sur le principe de specialite et la 'politisation' des institutions specialisees Pierre Klein | |
Judicial review of the acts of international organisations Elihu Lauterpacht | |
The WHO request Michael Bothe | |
The WHO case: implications for specialised agencies Virginia Leary | |
Substantive Aspects | |
Lotus and the double structure of international legal argument Ole Spiermann | |
Non liquet and the incompleteness of international law Daniel Bodansky | |
Treaty and custom Roger S. Clark | |
Nuclear weapons and jus cogens: pre-emptory norms and justice pre-empted? Jacob Werksman and Ruth Khalastchi | |
The question of the law of neutrality | |
La question du droit de la neutralite Christian Dominice | |
The status of nuclear weapons in the light of the Court's opinion of 8 July 1996 | |
Le statut des armes nucleaires a la lumiere de l'Avis de la CIJ du 8 juillet 1996 Eric David | |
International humanitarian law, or the exploration by the Court of a terra somewhat to it | |
Le droit international humanitaire, ou de l'exploration par la cour d'une terra a peu pres incognita pour elle Luigi Condorelli | |
Jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion Christopher Greenwood | |
On the relationship between jus ad bellum and jus in bello in the General Assembly Advisory Opinion Rein Mullerson | |
Necessity and proportionality in jus ad bellum and jus in bello Judith Gardam | |
The notion of 'state survival' in international law Marcelo G. Kohen | |
The right to life and genocide: the Court and international public policy Vera Gowlland-Debbas | |
Opening the door to the environment and to future generations Edith Brown Weiss | |
The use of nuclear weapons and the protection of the environment | |
Le recours a l'arme nucleaire et la protection de l'environnement: l'apport de la Cour internationale de Justice Djamchild Momtaz | |
The Non-Proliferation Treaty and its future Miguel Marin Bosch | |
The Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinions: The declarations and separate and dissenting opinions Hugh Thirlway | |
The perspective of Japanese international lawyers Yasuhiro Shigeta | |
The Opinions in their Broader Context | |
Between the individual and the state: international law at a crossroads? Pierre-Marie Dupuy | |
The Nuclear Weapons case David Kennedy | |
The political consequences of the General Assembly Advisory Opinion | |
The silence of law/the voice of justice Martti Koskenniemi | |
Fairness and the General Assembly Advisory Opinion | |
Select bibliography | |
Index | |
Table of Contents provided by Publisher. All Rights Reserved. |