Get Free Shipping on orders over $79
Justice Takes a Recess : Judicial Recess Appointments from George Washington to George W. Bush - Scott E. Graves

Justice Takes a Recess

Judicial Recess Appointments from George Washington to George W. Bush

By: Scott E. Graves, Robert M. Howard

eText | 16 May 2009 | Edition Number 1

At a Glance

eText


$78.29

or 4 interest-free payments of $19.57 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.

The Constitution allows the president to "fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session." In Justice Takes a Recess, Scott E. Graves and Robert M. Howard address how presidents have used recess appointments over time and whether the independence of judicial recess appointees is compromised. They argue that these appointments can upset the separation of powers envisioned by the Framers, shifting power away from one branch of government and toward another.

Examining every judicial recess appointment from 1789 to 2005, the authors discover that presidents are conditionally strategic when they unilaterally appoint federal judges during Senate recesses. Such appointments were made cautiously for most of the twentieth century, leading to a virtual moratorium for several decades, until three recent recess appointments to the courts in the face of Senate obstruction revived the controversy. These appointments suggest the beginning of a more assertive use of recess appointments in the increasingly politicized activity of staffing the federal courts. The authors argue that the recess appointment clause, as it pertains to the judiciary, is no longer necessary or desirable. The strategic use of such appointments by strong presidents to shift judicial ideology, combined with the lack of independence exhibited by judicial recess appointments, results in recess power that threatens constitutional features of the judicial branch.

on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

More in Civil Procedure, Litigation & Dispute Resolution

NEC3 and NEC4 Compared - Robert Alan Gerrard

eBOOK

RRP $137.26

$116.99

15%
OFF
Effectively Steering the Ship - Paula M. Lawhon

eBOOK

RRP $118.54

$94.99

20%
OFF
Family Lawyer as Peacemaker - Forrest S. Mosten

eBOOK

RRP $135.48

$108.99

20%
OFF
Back in The Game - Jay Cameron

eBOOK