Kyoto School Philosophy in Comparative Perspective

Masterfully written by a renowned philosopher trained in the European phenomenological-hermeneutic tradition and a pioneer in the intercultural practice of philosophy, this book perfectly fulfills its two main aims: to clarify the ideological controversy surrounding the Kyoto School and to interpret the contributions to philosophy of its main figures alongside others more familiar to Western readers, such as those of Husserl, Heidegger, Arendt, Merleau-Ponty, Ricoeur and Michel Henry. Beyond the interest that Japanese intellectual history may arouse in the reader, this work will captivate anyone who raises philosophical questions, since such long-standing discussions on modernity or totalitarianism and topics as life, time, the body, space, or reality acquire a new light in the fascinating dialogue that Stevens engages in, moving with ease between Asian and Western thought. This volume will undoubtedly be a reference work not only for the understanding of the philosophy of Nishida, Nishitani, Watsuji, or Kimura Bin, but also to generate new studies by the new lines of research it opens.

Students and scholars of modern Japanese philosophy will enthusiastically welcome - and greatly benefit from reading - this collection of comparative essays on the Kyoto School philosophers Nishida Kitaro and Nishitani Keiji, the political theorist Maruyama Masao, and the psychiatrist Kimura Bin. By bringing the ideas of these leading twentieth-century Japanese thinkers into critical dialogue with those of their contemporary European philosophers such as Hannah Arendt, Marice Merleau-Ponty, and Michel Henry, Bernard Stevens manages to shed new light on key issues in metaphysics and existential phenomenology as well as in political philosophy.