Introduction to the Anniversary Edition | p. xi |
Foreword to the First Edition | p. xix |
Crisis in Criminal Justice Policy | p. 1 |
The Crisis Emerges | p. 1 |
The Failure of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation | p. 4 |
Determinate and determinate Sentencing | p. 6 |
Attacking Rehabilitation: Determinate Sentencing Solves the Crisis | p. 8 |
Reaffirming Rehabilitation: The False Appeal of Determinate Sentencing | p. 11 |
Notes | p. 13 |
Criminal Justice Theories and Ideologies | p. 17 |
Schools of Criminological Thought | p. 18 |
The Classical School | p. 18 |
The Positivist School | p. 20 |
Political Ideologies and Criminal Justice Policy | p. 21 |
Conservative Ideology | p. 22 |
Liberal Ideology | p. 23 |
Radical Ideology | p. 24 |
Classicism, Positivism, and Political Ideology | p. 24 |
Conclusion | p. 26 |
Notes | p. 26 |
The Rise of Rehabilitation | p. 29 |
Curious Punishments of Bygone Days | p. 30 |
Enlightened Punishment | p. 32 |
The Invention of the Penitentiary: The Great American Experiment | p. 36 |
The New Penology | p. 40 |
The Progressive Era: Individualized Treatment | p. 45 |
The Legacy of Reform | p. 50 |
Notes | p. 51 |
Attacking Rehabilitation | p. 55 |
The Conservative Attack: Getting Tough on Crime | p. 56 |
The Liberal Attack: Doing Justice | p. 63 |
The Liberal Critique: Victimizing the Offender | p. 66 |
The Liberal Solution: The Justice Model | p. 75 |
A Note on Radical Reform and Determinate Sentencing | p. 79 |
Conclusion: Doing Justice or Getting Tough? | p. 80 |
Notes | p. 83 |
The Poverty of the Justice Model: The Corruption of Benevolence Revisited? | p. 91 |
Reconsidering the Justice Model: Problems With Determinate Sentencing | p. 92 |
Longer Sentences: The Potential for Repression | p. 92 |
Rigidity in Sentencing: Is Justice Served? | p. 95 |
Sentencing Disparity and the Expansion of Prosecutorial Power | p. 97 |
"Rehabilitation Doesn't Work": Is Punishing Really Better? | p. 102 |
The Deterioration of Prison Conditions | p. 104 |
Determinate Sentencing and Controlling Crime: Assessing the Conservatives' Position | p. 108 |
Conclusion | p. 110 |
Notes | p. 110 |
Implementing the Justice Model: Problems and Prospects | p. 121 |
The Process of Sentencing Reform in Illinois | p. 124 |
The Goals of Sentencing Reform | p. 126 |
Utilitarian Considerations in Sentencing | p. 127 |
Effects on Discretion and Disparity | p. 129 |
Discretion in Sentencing | p. 129 |
Parole Board and Institutional Discretion | p. 131 |
Prosecutorial Discretion | p. 132 |
Effects on Type and Length of Sentences | p. 133 |
California | p. 134 |
Indiana | p. 134 |
Illinois | p. 135 |
A Note on Guidelines | p. 135 |
Sentencing Guidelines | p. 136 |
Parole Release Guidelines | p. 138 |
General Considerations | p. 140 |
Conclusion | p. 140 |
Notes | p. 141 |
Reaffirming Rehabilitation | p. 147 |
The Value of Rehabilitation | p. 149 |
State Obligated Rehabilitation | p. 159 |
Correctional Official Accountability | p. 161 |
Parole Contracts | p. 163 |
Campaign in Favor of Rehabilitation | p. 166 |
Why Liberal Reform? | p. 168 |
Notes | p. 175 |
The Future of Rehabilitation: From Nothing Works to What Works (An Epilogue) | p. 181 |
The Mean Season in Corrections | p. 182 |
The Corruption of Sentencing Reform | p. 183 |
The Great American Prison Experiment | p. 188 |
The California Experience | p. 193 |
From Nothing Works to What Works | p. 199 |
Nothing Works: Martinson and Beyond | p. 199 |
What Works: Principles of Effective Correctional Treatment | p. 204 |
The Future of Corrections: Four Guiding Principles | p. 208 |
Practice Evidence-Based Corrections | p. 209 |
Increase Correctional Accountability | p. 211 |
It's Never Too Early, It's Never Too Late | p. 212 |
Continue to Reaffirm Rehabilitation | p. 214 |
Notes | p. 217 |
Name Index | p. 231 |
Subject Index | p. 235 |
Table of Contents provided by Ingram. All Rights Reserved. |