-Mazlish traces the rise of the modern 'professional revolutionary' from his early religious beginnings as 'godlike Legislator' through its early-modern 'Religious Stages, ' 'The Puritan Revolution and Cromwell, ' 'The French Revolution and Robespierre, ' right to the emergence of the Bolshevik and concludes with two elaborate case studies on Lenin and Mao Tse-tung. Mazlish's book is well structures and lucidly argues. To the almost complete exclusion of religion the Revolutionary Ascetic is construed as a secular, basically political, ascetic on ground of psychoanalytic theory.-
--Gert Mueller, Sociological Analysis
-[T]he volume is eminently readable and stimulating. I dare anyone to read it and not succumb to the temptation to rush to the library and check out Weber, Freud, Erik Erikson, James and John Stuart Mill, Bentham, Chernyshevsky, and Lenin.-
--Hendrik Van Dalen, The Journal of Politics
-This book does not claim to be a definitive statement. Yet it combines a salutary historical caution with enough theoretical daring to carry the discussion about personality and revolution to a new stage.-
--Mark N. Hagopian, The American Political Science Review
-Bruce Mazlish draws on Max Weber and Sigmund Freud as his two conceptual fountainheads in an effort to delineate a modern revolutionary type who features a pattern of internal hardness, control, and discipline, as a prerequisite for external certainty and domination of a political movement. Mazlish traces the historical development of religious asceticism with its displacement of the virtues of hard work, energetic activity, and frugality to economic activity. . . . Mazlish has contributed the specific revolutionary contexts of a group of these modern leaders within Weber's vision of the great transformation from 'innerworldly' to a 'worldly' asceticism.-
--Peter Loewenberg, The American Historical Review
-Bruce Mazlish is one of the most prominent and able historians who have chosen to poke about in the murky depths of psychohistory. . . . In The Revolutionary Ascetic, he does not attempt a full psychohistorical profile of his main characters but contents himself with selected observations about their mental states and inner compulsions. . . . Mazlish is a conscientious historian who is fully aware of the pitfalls involved in attempting to shed more light on historical causation by invoking the principles and procedures of psychology and psychotherapy.-
--Bernard Norling, The Review of Politics
-[S]uggestively illuminating.- --Louise Haberman, The Journal of Modern History
-[T]he value of the work lies in such 'human' comprehension of individual leaders as Mazlish is able to generate from his construct.-
--Eugene Victor Wolfenstein, Political Science Quarterly
"Mazlish traces the rise of the modern 'professional revolutionary' from his early religious beginnings as 'godlike Legislator' through its early-modern 'Religious Stages, ' 'The Puritan Revolution and Cromwell, ' 'The French Revolution and Robespierre, ' right to the emergence of the Bolshevik and concludes with two elaborate case studies on Lenin and Mao Tse-tung. Mazlish's book is well structures and lucidly argues. To the almost complete exclusion of religion the Revolutionary Ascetic is construed as a secular, basically political, ascetic on ground of psychoanalytic theory."
--Gert Mueller, Sociological Analysis
"[T]he volume is eminently readable and stimulating. I dare anyone to read it and not succumb to the temptation to rush to the library and check out Weber, Freud, Erik Erikson, James and John Stuart Mill, Bentham, Chernyshevsky, and Lenin."
--Hendrik Van Dalen, The Journal of Politics
"This book does not claim to be a definitive statement. Yet it combines a salutary historical caution with enough theoretical daring to carry the discussion about personality and revolution to a new stage."
--Mark N. Hagopian, The American Political Science Review
"Bruce Mazlish draws on Max Weber and Sigmund Freud as his two conceptual fountainheads in an effort to delineate a modern revolutionary type who features a pattern of internal hardness, control, and discipline, as a prerequisite for external certainty and domination of a political movement. Mazlish traces the historical development of religious asceticism with its displacement of the virtues of hard work, energetic activity, and frugality to economic activity. . . . Mazlish has contributed the specific revolutionary contexts of a group of these modern leaders within Weber's vision of the great transformation from 'innerworldly' to a 'worldly' asceticism."
--Peter Loewenberg, The American Historical Review
"Bruce Mazlish is one of the most prominent and able historians who have chosen to poke about in the murky depths of psychohistory. . . . In The Revolutionary Ascetic, he does not attempt a full psychohistorical profile of his main characters but contents himself with selected observations about their mental states and inner compulsions. . . . Mazlish is a conscientious historian who is fully aware of the pitfalls involved in attempting to shed more light on historical causation by invoking the principles and procedures of psychology and psychotherapy."
--Bernard Norling, The Review of Politics
"[S]uggestively illuminating." --Louise Haberman, The Journal of Modern History
"[T]he value of the work lies in such 'human' comprehension of individual leaders as Mazlish is able to generate from his construct."
--Eugene Victor Wolfenstein, Political Science Quarterly
"Mazlish traces the rise of the modern 'professional revolutionary' from his early religious beginnings as 'godlike Legislator' through its early-modern 'Religious Stages, ' 'The Puritan Revolution and Cromwell, ' 'The French Revolution and Robespierre, ' right to the emergence of the Bolshevik and concludes with two elaborate case studies on Lenin and Mao Tse-tung. Mazlish's book is well structures and lucidly argues. To the almost complete exclusion of religion the Revolutionary Ascetic is construed as a secular, basically political, ascetic on ground of psychoanalytic theory."
--Gert Mueller, Sociological Analysis
"[T]he volume is eminently readable and stimulating. I dare anyone to read it and not succumb to the temptation to rush to the library and check out Weber, Freud, Erik Erikson, James and John Stuart Mill, Bentham, Chernyshevsky, and Lenin."
--Hendrik Van Dalen, The Journal of Politics
"This book does not claim to be a definitive statement. Yet it combines a salutary historical caution with enough theoretical daring to carry the discussion about personality and revolution to a new stage."
--Mark N. Hagopian, The American Political Science Review
"Bruce Mazlish draws on Max Weber and Sigmund Freud as his two conceptual fountainheads in an effort to delineate a modern revolutionary type who features a pattern of internal hardness, control, and discipline, as a prerequisite for external certainty and domination of a political movement. Mazlish traces the historical development of religious asceticism with its displacement of the virtues of hard work, energetic activity, and frugality to economic activity. . . . Mazlish has contributed the specific revolutionary contexts of a group of these modern leaders within Weber's vision of the great transformation from 'innerworldly' to a 'worldly' asceticism."
--Peter Loewenberg, The American Historical Review
"Bruce Mazlish is one of the most prominent and able historians who have chosen to poke about in the murky depths of psychohistory. . . . In The Revolutionary Ascetic, he does not attempt a full psychohistorical profile of his main characters but contents himself with selected observations about their mental states and inner compulsions. . . . Mazlish is a conscientious historian who is fully aware of the pitfalls involved in attempting to shed more light on historical causation by invoking the principles and procedures of psychology and psychotherapy."
--Bernard Norling, The Review of Politics
"[S]uggestively illuminating." --Louise Haberman, The Journal of Modern History
"[T]he value of the work lies in such 'human' comprehension of individual leaders as Mazlish is able to generate from his construct."
--Eugene Victor Wolfenstein, Political Science Quarterly
