Advances in Pattern Recognition - ICAPR 2001 : Second International Conference Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, March 11-14, 2001 Proceedings - Sameer Singh

eTEXT

Advances in Pattern Recognition - ICAPR 2001

Second International Conference Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, March 11-14, 2001 Proceedings

By: Sameer Singh, Nabeel Murshed, Walter Kropatsch

eText | 29 June 2003 | Edition Number 1

At a Glance

eText


$84.99

or 4 interest-free payments of $21.25 with

 or 

Instant online reading in your Booktopia eTextbook Library *

Read online on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

Not downloadable to your eReader or an app

Why choose an eTextbook?

Instant Access *

Purchase and read your book immediately

Read Aloud

Listen and follow along as Bookshelf reads to you

Study Tools

Built-in study tools like highlights and more

* eTextbooks are not downloadable to your eReader or an app and can be accessed via web browsers only. You must be connected to the internet and have no technical issues with your device or browser that could prevent the eTextbook from operating.
The paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we describe the no- orientation-discontinuity interfering model based on a Gaussian stochastic model in analyzing the properties of the interfering strokes. In section 3, we describe the improved canny edge detector with an ed- orientation constraint to detect the edges and recover the weak ones of the foreground words and characters; In section 4, we illustrate, discuss and evaluate the experimental results of the proposed method, demonstrating that our algorithm significantly improves the segmentation quality; Section 5 concludes this paper. 2. The norm-orientation-discontinuity interfering stroke model Figure 2 shows three typical samples of original image segments from the original documents and their magnitude of the detected edges respectively. The magnitude of the gradient is converted into the gray level value. The darker the edge is, the larger is the gradient magnitude. It is obvious that the topmost strong edges correspond to foreground edges. It should be noted that, while usually, the foreground writing appears darker than the background image, as shown in sample image Figure 2(a), there are cases where the foreground and background have similar intensities as shown in Figure 2(b), or worst still, the background is more prominent than the foreground as in Figure 2(c). So using only the intensity value is not enough to differentiate the foreground from the background. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
Read online on
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile

More in Computer Vision